At this point we are considering the Biblical and theological issues around healing. It may seem cold logic to those who are sick, but it's essential to think correctly and to have expectations that are Biblical. If we do not think Biblically we can be thrown into additional confusion and turmoil when confronted with the already difficult struggle of suffering and sickness.
Much has been made of the passage in Isaiah 53:5 "by his wounds we are healed." We are told that the cross guarantees healing . As one person put it, "Jesus bore our sickness and carried your diseases at the same time and in the same manner that he bore your sins. You are just as free from sickness and disease as you are free from sin" (Gloria Copeland.)
Is 53:5 goes like this.
... he was pierced for our transgressions,
he was crushed for our iniquities;
the punishment that brought us peace was upon him,
and by his wounds we are healed.
The passage is a poem that uses a poetic devise called 'synonymous parallelism.' Simply, the expression of the first line is repeated by the second, but in different words. 'Transgressions' is the same as 'iniquities;' 'Peace' is repeated by 'healing.' In other words, Isaiah's theme is restoration from sin; healing is the peace of sins removed. As one person put it, "we were sick unto death because of our sins; but he... became the source of our healing" (Delitzsch.) (See also Is.1:4 - 6 and Jer. 30:12-17 where sickness is used metaphorically to describe sin and healing is a picture of restoration.)
Some point to the fact that the word peace (shalom) can mean complete restoration, including physical healing and health. True. Mostly, though, it has some particular dimension of peace in mind, for example, peace between waring parties. The context determines what the meaning and focus is. Peter clearly understood the meaning here as freedom from sin and spiritual restoration of God's people, for he quotes Isaiah saying,
He himself bore our sins in his body on the tree, so that we might die to sins and live for righteousness; by his wounds you have been healed. 1Pet. 2:24
The healing Isaiah speaks of is not physical healing but the removal of sin, reconciliation with God and the freedom to live a life unto God.
There are other reasons why it seems wrong to suggest that we receive physical healing equally, in the same manner and to the same degree that we receive forgiveness of sin through faith in the cross of Christ. To begin with, people are not healed completely the minute they believe in Christ, even though they have faith in the cross. Then, christians still get sick, even though we say forgiveness is complete and full (we are justified though faith.) Even more seriously and dangerously, if the two are so connected, should we now say that a lack of healing, ipso facto, indicates a lack of forgiveness, since one is as much guaranteed by the cross as the other? There are few willing to suggest such a thing. Wisely so. But we would not say this because we do not believe the two are so related. However, the danger is that if we connect them too strongly, the lack of healing can subtly become a crisis of faith regarding my salvation. I believe some have suffered from such unnecessary soul searching as a result of faulty teaching regarding healing through the atonement.
What then is the connection between the cross and healing? We'll look at that next time.